Categorycourses Taught

Diplomacy Econ & ocirc; mica (2006)

30/01/2006 0 By Rodrigo Cintra
Faculty of Campinas – FACAMP

Course
International relations

Discipline
T & oacute; Adv & ccedil peaks; ed & ccedil in relation; & otilde; s International III – Diplomacy Econ & ocirc; mica


Load Hor & aacute; ria
64h (4 cr & eacute; said)

Professor
M. Sc. Rodrigo Cintra

Summary
The course examines the interfaces between the deciles & atilde making processes; in the pol & iacute; commercial foreign and government and private actors, and their conditions within these processes. The student must & aacute; develop anal capabilities & iacute; optics that allow evaluating a pol & iacute; tica external trade (resulting) in fun & ccedil; & atilde; the interaction & ccedil; & atilde, the between different actors mobilized (agents) and mechanisms available & iacute; MOBILE and used to influence the outcome (process).

Methodology
Classes be & HAND the exhibition or an á lysis case studies. Case studies & atilde be, presented by the student groups, be & HAND the respons á LEVELS by an á lysis of factors and actors involved in each case studied.

Crit & eacute; rivers Evaluates & ccedil; & atilde, the

Students & atilde be, the evaluated according to the rules of procedure established by establishing & ccedil; & atilde, the, which means THREE evaluates s & ccedil; & otilde; s semi-. Be & aacute; requested a final semester work, which constitute á the relat & oacute; river a case study developed during the semester. The THREE evaluates s & ccedil; & otilde; s have & HAND weight 1 every, and the student must & aacute; reaches MAKE-air m & eacute; m & iacute day, equal to Nima 7 to be approved. When m & eacute; day is less than 7, the student must & aacute; make the Final Round, and to be considered approved in the discipline duty & aacute; reaches MAKE-air m & eacute; m & iacute day; of Nima 6.

goals
Discipline have & aacute; as its main objective the study of an á lysis & atilde decision-making process; the & iacute in pol, commercial external topical, especially with regard & worse; identifies & ccedil & atilde; or (1) the actors involved, (2) the forms of the ccedil &; & atilde, the available & iacute; LEVELS for each type of actor, e (3) & limits of ccedil; & otilde; s institutional nature encountered in making decision HANDS, the.
As an á analyzes be & atilde, originally based in the Brazilian and North American cases, It is aiming, from them, generalizes & ccedil; & atilde, the. The purpose of this approach & eacute; offer the student indicates & ccedil; & atilde, the major factors to be observed in a study of this nature, so that it is able to develop an á analyzes the process of decision making & otilde; es in pol & iacute; tica external trade in other international realities.

Conte STILL do Program & aacute; tico:
actors

– Government
– Interest groups
– Groups pressure HANDS, the
Decision making & atilde; o / & atilde dimension, the institutional
– Pol RIVER external tica as pol RIVER tica p STILL Republic
– Rela & ccedil; & atilde, the executive-legislative
– Decision-making & atilde; in the pol & iacute; tica external (pol RIVER redistribution tica)
Ways of ccedil &; & atilde, the
– Lobby
– lobby Instruments (grass roots lobbying)
– Motiva & ccedil; & otilde; es of decision makers & atilde; the

Schedule

Data Descriptive
10/fev Features & ccedil; & atilde; the Course
17/fev Is & ccedil; & atilde; the Interests
– Ainsworth (4)
24/fev Interest groups
– Ainsworth (2, 3)
03/mar Press & atilde groups; the
– Hill
10/mar Pol RIVER External tica and Pol RIVER tica P STILL Republic
– Charillon (6, 7)
17/mar Rela & ccedil; & otilde; Executive-Legislative es
– Ainsworth (7)
24/mar Pol & iacute; tica Redistribuitiva e Pol & iacute; tica External
– McGillivray (1)
31/mar Lobby
– Ainsworth (5, 6)
07/Apr Test 2
14/Apr Holiday – Friday the Paix & atilde, the
21/Apr Holiday – Tiradentes
28/Apr Grass Roots Lobbying
– Ainsworth (8)
05/May Motiva & ccedil; & otilde; es in making decision & atilde; the (1): electoral system and dispersion & atilde, the productive
– McGillivray (2)
12/May Motiva & ccedil; & otilde; es in making decision & atilde; the (2): elei & ccedil; & otilde; is, groups and resources
– Ainsworth (9)
19/May ENERI
26/May Case study (1): steel mill: US and Brazil
Case study (2): to choose
02/jun Half test (in RIVER cio)
09/jun Half test (closing)
16/jun Final Test (in RIVER cio)
23/day Final Test (closing)
30/jun  
03/jul Discloses & ccedil; & atilde, the final results

readings:

Source: http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/itps/0300/ijpp/ijpp0300.pdf

Source: http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/itps/0803/ijpp/ijpp0803.pdf

Source: http://usinfo.state.gov/journals/itps/1102/ijpp/ijpp1102.pdf
 

Source: http://www.mpi-fg-koeln.mpg.de/pu/mpifg_dp/dp04-6.pdf

Source:  http://www.camara.gov.br/ronaldocaiado/NG20060505.htm#n07

Tagseconomic diplomacy economy international relations

About The Author

Post-doctorate in Territorial Competitiveness and Creative Industries, by Dinâmia - Center for the Study of Socioeconomic Change, of Sciences of the Institute of Labor and Enterprise (ISCTE, Lisboa, Portugal). PhD in International Relations from the University of Brasilia (2007); Master in Political Science from the University of São Paulo (2001); and a degree in International Relations from the Catholic University of São Paulo (1998). Academic Director of ESPM-SP graduation and Head of International Office.

Leave a Reply