The government changed, will the company also?
01/10/2005After the transition & ccedil; & atilde, the, officially entered the Lula government. More than a change & ccedil; the Cardosos to Silvas, the challenges that are & atilde, the posts and the government & aggravate; Brazilian society overcome & atilde, the simple DANCING of the ministerial offices. The Lula government face & aacute;, largely, the same difficulties faced by FHC in 1 January 1995, when he took office. Like this, to understand the eat & ccedil, the this new government, & Eacute; interesting back and analyze who now leaves the Pal & aacute; cio Plateau.
Like it or not & atilde; the, former President Fernando Henrique Cardoso presented invej & aacute qualities; LEVELS any ruler, while that presented failures. Let us return to 1995.
In & acirc; internal framework, o uso da URV (Reference Unit Value) He used the pr & oacute; prio poison inflación & aacute; rio to prepare the serum that would end the fifteen years inflates & ccedil; & atilde; rampant that plagued the Brazilian economy and, greatly, much of the population & ccedil; & atilde, the n & atilde, had access to products banc & aacute; rivers. This again brought hope & ccedil; to resume econ growth & FLYING; mico. The cen & aacute; rio econ & FLYING; mico please á vel, joined a climate pol & iacute; prop-toxic & iacute; CIO & worse; stability. The PSDB the & eacute; era presented with the same qualities today embodied in EN, that is, a party formed by one o'clock ET base á level, as Lide & ccedil, as important, honest and highly capable to address constructively the main Brazilian problems.
It was believed at that time that old Brazilian left the evils everyday just to be part of literature and the historical & oacute classes; ria. The modernizes & ccedil; & atilde, the social democracy would definitely with Northeastern warlords and the Southeast neopopulism, establishing relationship & ccedil; & otilde; s pol & iacute; s optical & oacute; read and guided the great values of legitimacy and the quest for justice & ccedil, the.
However, past eight years and two FHC / PSDB governments, some of these promises have materialized. N & atilde, the remains d & uacute; lives on significant advances & ccedil and those who checked in size & atilde; social: infant mortality fell from 48 for 30 per thousand born while the illiteracy rate fell to 13% in 2000, comparing up to 19% found in 1991. The reform agr á ria was another important sector in which the Cardoso government worked tirelessly. In & acirc; international scope, through & eacute; s of an active presidential diplomacy, FHC managed to design the pa & iacute; s in major international fora decision & oacute; rivers and among some of the & ccedil; & otilde; s core international Contemporáneo & acirc system; neo, especially Fran & ccedil, the.
If the government could advance MAKE-air both these á areas, why let the population & ccedil; & atilde, the Brazilian T & atilde, the disappointed – decep & ccedil; & atilde, the this expressed in the election results & uacute; last?
One of the main ways to understand this relative failure is & aacute; in pr & oacute; pria structure pol & iacute; tica Brazilian. Much has been said about reform pol & iacute; tica, especially after the fen & FLYING; meno En & eacute; the, but little to deepen the real meaning of this reform. As usual, we focus our attention & ccedil; & otilde; es in the institutional structures of our problems, playing for the legislation & ccedil; & atilde, the all resolutions & ccedil; & atilde; the our problems. Like this, the lack of modern electoral base, based on relationship & ccedil; & otilde; es is & ccedil; & atilde, the real becomes the need for mixed district vote; the gift & iacute; nio caudilhesco major Brazilian parties becomes the closed lists; the lack of identity ideol & oacute; Gene and commitment to a government project becomes the mandate Party & aacute; rio.
these problems, the n & atilde, they are addressed in the dimension & atilde, the correct, end up hiding the reality of the Brazilian State. Even before a Social Democratic government R & iacute; you give enlightened and, although says contr & aacute; rio, will pol & iacute; tica to change, what we saw was to repeat & ccedil; & atilde; the pr & aacute; disguised & ccedil traditionalists optics; adas with sophisticated avant-garde arguments. Some examples could have agreed to population & ccedil; & atilde, the Brazilian before, By & eacute; m she was absorbed in to survive in everyday life. Among them we can mention the presid & ecirc; INSTANCE the Senate fall into HAND those of a senator (then impeached) accused of pr & aacute; fully antidemocr optical á optical or the division & atilde; the state apparatus between groups known contr á rivers to the development of participatory democracy.
However, blame the despotism pol & iacute; typical for all our problems & eacute; repeat the same mistake we practice since the arrival of Fam & iacute; lia Real in Brazil. Largely, the main factor in preserving & ccedil; & atilde; the archaic structure under which stands the whole Brazilian society & eacute; full and unrestricted lack of identity between the Brazilian elites and Brazil. Bound to dwell in pa & iacute; s undeveloped (& Ldquo; developing” according to some, but a development that repeats a distributes & ccedil; & atilde; the shameful n & atilde income, the development should be called), nossas elites esforçam-se por construir/copiar oásis de desenvolvimento e riqueza. Vejamos o Rio de Janeiro, que guarda alguns dos principais símbolos nacionais brasileiros – Cristo Redentor, Pão de Açúcar e Copacabana – ostentar uma réplica da Estátua da Liberdade no bairro emergente da Barra. Ou peguemos São Paulo com suas inúmeras towers e maisons recriando estilosos prédios estadunidenses.
Freq & uuml; entando restaurants that cost more than you pay for a maid gift & eacute; stica throughout the M & ecirc; s or using queues banc & aacute; sary to & ldquo; special customers” we getting used to transform the inequality in normal. For Brazil to stop being this giant lying in eternal ber & ccedil, the ESPL & ecirc; ndido, our elites need & atilde, the wake up and stop being embarrassed to take over as Brazilian. Like it or not & atilde; the, We born here.
Even as a soci & oacute; logo, former President Fernando Henrique Cardoso n & atilde, demonstrated the ability necessary á ria to change this social structure – You may not be able to change something that has been checked with great care for five s & eacute; glasses. The government now takes, what more desire & eacute; who can make the elites modify the way they conceive Brazil and its role in it.
The success of Lula / PT est & aacute; al & eacute; m capacity that can present to administer the res publica, & Eacute; I need care, before everything, the next being thing p & uacute; Republic.
Moral of the hist & oacute; ria: if Brazil & eacute; really pa & iacute; s future, & Eacute; Best eats & ccedil; Armos to move us in the present.
Council Liter & aacute; rio:
& Ldquo; who knows the vegetation & ccedil; & atilde; the our land since the parasite mimosa at & eacute; the giant early; who in the animal kingdom falls tiger and tapir, s & iacute; ferocity of symbols and is MAKE-a, AT & eacute; the beautiful hummingbird and gold insect; who look at this c & eacute; u passing of pure indigo to bronzed reflections announcing the big storms; Who saw it, Under the Green pel & uacute; copy of the enameled flowers grass covering our v á rzeas, slide thousand repeat that lead to death in a á take poison, which comprises á felt Alvaro & rdquo;.
The Guarani – Jos & eacute; de Alencar
Originally published in:
magazine Author (www.revistaautor.com.br)
Pol & iacute; tica
What III nº 19 – January 2003