Iraq war and the new standards of the international system
01/10/2005Since the fall of the Berlin Wall (1989) e, about everything, the break-up of Uni & atilde, the Sovi & eacute; tica (1991), the world has sought to outline your new profile. Although some analysts seek to call the current international structure & quot; globalization & ccedil; & atilde; the & quot;, for lack of alternative use & quot; p & oacute; s Cold War-& quot;.
The bipolar structure forms froze & relationship ccedil; & otilde; s for approximately five International d & eacute; ed, conditioning strongly as we do our an á analyzes. Generally, events such as the war Iugosl á via, the attacks of 11 September or the wars US-Iraq s & atilde, the analyzed under & oacute; more orthodox optical theories of relationship & ccedil; & otilde; s International.
A second war (current) against Iraq can be analyzed as a continuous & ccedil; & atilde; the first war (1991/1992), n & atilde; both by the conflict of objectives themselves, but by implementing & ccedil; & atilde; the power project whose deed & ccedil; & atilde, dating back to the Reagan administration (1981/89). This time aimed to end the conflict pol & iacute; Fret ideol & oacute; magician in order to strengthen the position & ccedil; & atilde; the US in the international system, especially in its dimension & atilde; econ & FLYING; mica.
During the Cold War the relationship & ccedil; & otilde; es between the two super-pot & ecirc; TRENDS were such that their acts & ccedil; & otilde; es in the international system respected one R & oacute; exclusion & atilde gene, the interferon & ecirc; INSTANCE in the field of influ & ecirc; others INSTANCE. With its end, the international system lost this refer & ecirc; INSTANCE and now has international structures institutionalized j & aacute; existing, highlighting the case of In & ccedil & otilde; is United (HIM) and organizes & ccedil; & atilde; the Atl & acirc the Treaty; ntico North (OTAN).
The government of George H. W. Bush (1989-93) acted in an international system in dismemberment, allowing the United States develop its first test ecirc & tendon, imperial INSTANCE. J á during the administration William J. Clinton (1993-2001) encountered a more permissive international system for the performance of their ccedil &; & otilde; s there has been a significant change & ccedil; the international agenda, so that the United States could develop a large econ & FLYING growth; internal medical.
In this sense, or President George W. Bush (2001-here I'm) found in acirc &; scope gift & eacute; stico one pa & iacute; s economically stronger and politically est á vel and acirc &; international scope an order pol & iacute; outdated Fret institutional and without the presence & ccedil; the p & oacute; alternative structural them in the short term. These character & iacute; s & sticas atilde, the key to understand the way in which the United States take their decision & otilde; s and the Why Not? & Ecirc; of your choices.
The war against Iraq has reopened the discussion & atilde; the system on international Contemporáneo & acirc; neo as well as which are & atilde, the the limits & ccedil; & otilde; s actors, whatever they are. The discussion & atilde; the about the war soon lost its focus origin & aacute; rio, that is, the poss & iacute; vel non-compliance with resolutions & ccedil; & otilde; s UN by Iraq, to make a dimension & atilde, the positioning please á vel or contr & aacute; rio & aggravate; acts & ccedil; & atilde, the US noting only their pr & oacute; Pippen ways of understanding the world.
Although it manifested & ccedil; & otilde; es contr & aacute; holiday & aggravate; war occurred v á rivers pa & iacute; ses, the center of the quest & atilde, the occurred in Europe. As an á analyzes exceeded the limits of the war to find its main axis of discussion & atilde; in the polarizes & ccedil; & atilde; pol & iacute; tica between the United States, on one side, and Germany / France & ccedil; the other. Such discussion & atilde; the first was to cen & aacute; rio the Board of security & ccedil, the, however, in view of their operational procedures, soon lost the legitimacy to be a f & oacute; concrete rum for discussion & otilde; es. In aus & ecirc; INSTANCE of other possible leads & ccedil; & atilde; the trades of & ccedil; & otilde; s the way was found around & getting worse; sidedness.
In making such, such discussion & otilde; es are presented as a cen & aacute; rio privileged to think the poss & iacute; LEVELS developments in the international system.
The strengthening of a more unilateral line, plus the international institutional system exceeded makes the US government understand the world in a more simplistic way in which there are two sides: n & oacute; s and they. The government's hard line (falç & oacute; you) He believes that those pa & iacute; n & ses atilde; the arise please á LEVELS & aggravate; War s & atilde, the enemies; this means that the SPACE; & diverg to the ecirc; INSTANCE are á increasingly restricted, especially when we have in mind the increasing limits & ccedil; & otilde; UN es.
Thereby, di á logo among v á rivers international actors weakens j & aacute; that language & eacute; different for each. Presidents Jacques Chirac (Fran & ccedil, the) Vladimir Putin's (Russia) They claim that the dispute boils down & getting worse; discord & acirc; INSTANCE on the means of war and n & atilde; the same for the purposes of, looking for a reconnecting & ccedil; & atilde, the politico-diplomatic & aacute; tica with the United States. J & aacute; o presidente Gerard Schroeder (Germany) It had its limit of a & ccedil; & atilde, the Miniature & iacute; n & of the atilde; let a half-open door and put up as the main R & iacute; der contr & aacute; rio & aggravate; US form leads MAKE-HANDS, the quest HANDS, the.
The polarizing MAKE-HANDS, the internal Uni & atilde; Europ & eacute; would also & eacute; m demonstrated the weakness of the link & HAND well as amateur their bases acts MAKE-HANDS, the external, as shown by both the current case as the recognition of Cro á cia & amid worsening; War Iugosl á via.
In the process of solidifying & ccedil; & atilde, the, Uni & atilde; Europ & eacute; was concentrated in cohesiveness & HAND the internal, particularly for those quest & otilde; s linked & worse; econ performance & FLYING; and mica, thereby, left little SPACE; for the discussion & otilde; es under what conditions & ccedil; & otilde; es and how occur & aacute; making decision & otilde; es on quest & otilde; s International.
The division & atilde; the internal of europ & eacute companies; ias around the quest & atilde; the war, although it may temporarily weaken the coaliz & otilde; s government tend to put on the agenda of agendas gift & eacute; sticas the quest & atilde; the pol & iacute; tica outside the Uni & atilde, the Europ & eacute; ia. The case of Germany & eacute; emblem as á that effect optical j á that discussion & atilde, the war took place on a cen & aacute; rio election, when the quest & atilde; pol & iacute; tica presents with high sensitivity to the population & ccedil; & atilde, the. To emerge victorious in & uacute; FULL EXTENT election & ccedil; & otilde; es, Schroeder took the discussion & atilde; the war to assert its conditions & ccedil; & atilde; the leadership & ccedil, the.
Although this process n & atilde, the occurred in equal intensity in Fran & ccedil; and the other pa & iacute; European ses, the highlight & aggravate; war given by m & iacute; day brought to the internal debate a quest & atilde; international extra-Uni & atilde, the Europ & eacute; ia. Once finished the war and sent the quest & atilde, the Iraqi management p & oacute; s-war debate about the quest & atilde, the safety & ccedil; international and Europe's role in Driving & ccedil; & atilde, the international conflicts will become & aacute ; an important issue.
That is á gallium, Uni & atilde; Europ & eacute; would come MAKE-air á undergoing a pressure & atilde, the largest in dire & ccedil; & atilde; the establishment of a works & ccedil; & atilde; international SUSTAINABLE á vel, especially in light of increases & ccedil; & atilde; the to the East, to involve & aacute; new quest & otilde; es geopol & iacute; optical and geoecon & FLYING; mica in their din & acirc; internal mica.
The crisis has opened within NATO, in view of the position & ccedil; & otilde; divergent es adopted by v á rivers States also & eacute; m stimulate & aacute; the discussion & atilde, the internal about the objectives of the Organization & ccedil; & atilde, the, resuming a discussion & atilde, which has its in & iacute; in heat expansion & atilde; the amount of external members & aggravate; region & atilde; the Atl & acirc; ntico North, although of great significance for the stability of the region & atilde; the.
The war against Iraq, in this sense, more than a bilateral issue (petr & COLLISION leo) I multilateral (observ & acirc; & ncia de résolu ccedil; & otilde; eg by UN), is presented as a first test for the new standard & otilde; es of pol & iacute; tica international.
What III nº 22 – April 2003