The foundations of EU expansion

Among the major contributions that Europe has & aggravate; s relationship & ccedil; & otilde, international es in the second half of the s & eacute; Twentieth Century was the construction & ccedil; & atilde, the what we now call the Uni & atilde, the Europ & eacute; ia. In the first half of the s & eacute; twentieth century the world, estasiado, saw two world wars ravage pa & iacute; whole ses and show the worst character & iacute; sticas a human being & eacute; able to have. The United found themselves engaged in efforts & ccedil; the war that used the resources of the pa & iacute; ses for the sake of destruction & ccedil; & atilde, the. Given this situation and overcome the first manifested & ccedil; & otilde; s revulsion that has been created within the territory & oacute; European river, what we saw was a huge effort & ccedil; to prevent the emergence of a new incompreens & iacute; vel war, as the French say.

This process took place initially through & eacute; s economy to create & ccedil; & atilde; the Community Europ & eacute; ia Coal & atilde; o and A & ccedil, the and the subsequent establishment of the Community Econ & FLYING; mica Europ & eacute; ia. Therefore, we can see that the process presents an econ & FLYING structure; mica, & motivates their ccedil; & otilde; s & s initial HAND the highly pol & iacute; topical; therefore the understanding of any advance & ccedil, the full & ccedil; & atilde; o / & atilde expansion, the europ & eacute; ia must necessarily take into account the two pair & acirc; m mentioned (throughout the process we observe a pendulum motion between these pair & acirc; meters).

Since the end of the Cold War new quest & otilde; s & v ecirc; m being placed with European, especially with regard to the future of uni & atilde, the. The debate traditionally divided between those who advocated a greater qualitative deepening of establishing & ccedil; & otilde; s common, seeking to increase its legitimacy. On the other hand, The following were the proponents of expansion HANDS, the quantity of uni HANDS, the, aggregating new Member States. The conflict between these two positions & ccedil; & otilde; s both are allowed to develop over the & uacute; past 5 years.

Recently, Ireland authorized extends MAKE-HANDS, the uni & HAND the ending the & uacute; last internal barrier & aggravate; s discussion & otilde; s on the expansion HANDS; the UNI & atilde; Europ & eacute; ia, now discuss the input forms 10 new members. Such reforms be atilde &, the conclu & iacute; in the 2004 and represent an important step towards deepening integrates & ccedil; & atilde, the europ & eacute; ia (especially in its dimension & atilde; pol & iacute; tica-strategy & eacute; Gene).

With solidifies & ccedil; & atilde; institutional and pol & iacute; tica of relationship & ccedil; & otilde; es between the pa & iacute; ses and the end of the Cold War the pa & iacute; ses members uni & atilde, the initiated debates more s & eacute; rivers about which limits would be geographical á physical Europe, which involved a number of other Quest & otilde; es as nationalism, identity and dispositions & ccedil; & atilde, the cooperative. The expansion & atilde; the EU to the east, although conclu & iacute; the only in its initial phase, shows a strong trend & ecirc; INSTANCE overcomes MAKE-HANDS, the question of & otilde; s bipolar structure in the MAKE-HANDS, the Pol & iacute; & eacute optical europ; would.

The advancement MAKE-the full MAKE-HANDS; Europ & eacute; was strongly were marked by a voltage double HANDS, the: (1) on the one hand there was the internal fear of any reca & iacute; of the relationship between the pa & iacute; European ses and could lead & aggravate; new wars, T & atilde; v & iacute; lives in the minds of some of the leading writers of uni & atilde; e (2), on the other hand, the din & acirc; international mica placed significant obstacles in the discussion & atilde, the of what & eacute; be European and, therefore, what are the limits of expansion & atilde; the.

However, & atilde the expansion, the seems to become successful from the standpoint inch & iacute; optical, the size & HAND econ & FLYING; n & mica still HAND est á resolved and requerir & aacute; DISP & ecirc, indium a relatively high amount of effort MAKE-pol & iacute; optical, both & acirc; & eacute gift scope; stico of each Member State as the structure & ccedil; & atilde, the EU and its relations & ccedil; & otilde; es with the rest of the world. At this point, the main quest & atilde; what is presented & eacute; the pol & iacute; tica agr & iacute; glue, which are á directly linked to incentive econ & FLYING; monkey & aggravate; s & otilde region; s least developed (which now occupy 89% or the & ccedil; amento EU). If the n & atilde process; for the well-structured Member States today recipients of these features feel if- & atilde; harmed by the admission of new members and this results & aacute; & ecirc a tendon; INSTANCE and less cooperative, therefore, delay & aacute; deepening integrates & ccedil; & atilde; econ & FLYING; mica while that power & aacute; create deep traumas full & ccedil; & atilde; pol & iacute; tica.

To prepare for the inclusion & atilde, the new members, the R & iacute; EU deres gathered in the Gr & eacute; cia to prepare It is the & ccedil; & atilde, the EU, to be & aacute; effectively discussed in October pr & oacute; ximo. Among the important changes & ccedil; & otilde; es It is provided for in & ccedil; & atilde; the & eacute; the exposure & ccedil; & atilde, the clearer the decision & oacute processes; European rivers, exposing those which clearly saves RACING & ecirc; TRENDS and how this should be carried out. The path n & atilde; duty & aacute; be f á cyl and require á a new round of cess & atilde, the part of national sovereignty to the EU; something that currently presents operational difficulties, but the background is important pr & oacute; uni & Pria HAND the, as & eacute; the case of ado & ccedil; & atilde, the Euro and the end of the intra-europ & eacute borders; ial.

Despite these structural difficulties, the advancement MAKE-Uni the HANDS; Europ & eacute; direction & would worsen; ed MAKE-HANDS; the & constitutes a ccedil; & HAND also the & eacute; m & sist presents obstacles ecirc; tamarins. The Conference & ecirc; Intergovernmental INSTANCE which should á We are discussing the & ccedil project; & atilde, prepared by the convention & ccedil; & atilde, chaired by the former President & ecirc franc; s Val & eacute; ry Giscard d'Estaing now & eacute; chaired by Italian President Silvio Berlusconi, n & atilde; s & oacute; n & HAND the has an image SUSTAINABLE á level in vis & HAND that of their European counterparts but also & eacute; m n & HAND possesses due tino diplomatic á toxic to the leads MAKE-HANDS, das sens & iacute; MOBILE discussion & otilde; s occurring in & acirc; EU framework.

In n & iacute; bilateral level the relationship & ccedil; & otilde; s also & eacute; m n & atilde; s & atilde; very promising in that both the left and the French center-right and the Social Democrats German & atilde; es (that s & atilde; the key is & ccedil; the pol & iacute; typical of the two pillars of the EU States) s & atilde; openly contrary á holiday Berlusconi. The Italian support & aggravate; intervention & ccedil; & atilde, the US Iraq still n & atilde; it was fully digested by European – Traditional supporters of establishing & ccedil; & otilde; s international multilateral and international law.

It seems, the advancement & ccedil, the EU suffer & aacute; a significant delay in its execution & ccedil; & atilde; e, probably, on its agenda during presid & ecirc; Italian INSTANCE. The quest & atilde, which stands for the future of integrated & ccedil; & atilde; the & eacute; to know at & eacute; what extent the impacts pol & iacute; ticos Berlusconi in presid & ecirc; INSTANCE of the European Council to create & aacute; a situation & ccedil; & atilde, the in which position & ccedil; & otilde; divergent es see is enlarged and fa & ccedil; am that Member States use more time to discuss them than to prepare their structures gift & eacute; statistics for the integration & ccedil; & atilde; O. And this problem becomes even a thunderstorm complicating, j á that advances & ccedil; the east j & aacute; Eat & ccedil; or.

Mercosur, if you want to be more than a piece & ccedil; the ret & oacute; rich of the Southern Cone presidents, Duty & aacute; face problems with the same depth as Europe has been treating his part & ccedil; & atilde, the. Otherwise, we will continue to do things for ingl & ecirc; s view.

Economics and Pol & iacute; tica can AT & eacute; be & ecirc g; meo, but never conjoined.

& Quot; The horrors of World War II and their flagella, the active evil subs & iacute; overbearing heat of power by totalit & aacute regimes; rivers and liabilities of evil suffering of their inumer á LEVELS v & iacute; optimal instigated demand and rekindled the hope & ccedil, to the possibility of building a humanity Pac & iacute; is"
With & eacute; Commerce, Disarmament and Human Rights – Celso Lafer

Originally published in:

InterCivitas (Colleges Tancredo Neves, 2003)

magazine Author (www.revistaautor.com.br)

International

Now III – nº 30 / December 2003