The strength of the Brazilian Leviathan
01/10/2005The hist & oacute; ria & eacute Brazilian society; marked by an intense presence & ccedil; the state apparatus. Even more than create deep distortion & ccedil; & otilde; s econ & FLYING; mica, such presence MAKE-led & aggravate; Fashion & ccedil; & atilde; the standard & otilde, social and behavioral es that make a sustained inheritance & ccedil; social, whose din & acirc; mica insists on creating a harmful process in the development and modernization & ccedil; & atilde, the Brazilian.
You know-it aggravates it &; exce & ccedil; & atilde; or Single RIVER charismatic duos & aacute; ticos, the potentiates & ccedil; & atilde, the intereses of private s & atilde, the dependent access that people t & ecirc; m & aggravate; s structures and the process of establishing social norms, and the most powerful s & HAND the ones that may contribute to its structure MAKE-HANDS, the so as to converge with their General interests. On the other hand, the fragments & ccedil; & atilde, the modern societies makes indiv & iacute; duos have to seek NETWORKING & ccedil; & otilde; sectoral es to alcan & ccedil; arem the legitimacy necessary á ria to hold & ccedil; & atilde, the interests.
In Brazil, as the presence & ccedil the state was (& Eacute;) intense, the NETWORKING & ccedil; & otilde; sectoral es findaram by articulating around access and control of burocr structures & aacute; optical. Thus, discuss & otilde; es that should occur in the social bulge just internalized the states and follow institutional rituals that sustain, making the State ceases to be an instrument with relative autonomy, to consolidate & ccedil; & atilde, the turns of the & ccedil; & otilde; es demanded by the debate p & uacute; PUBLIC to become a participatory one and interested in the result of the debate.
Some is & ccedil; private receive increasing est & iacute; mules for is & ccedil; air a change & ccedil; the & acirc; scope of trades & ccedil; & atilde, the order to act in cen á rivers more prop & iacute; heats & aggravate; s your demands. Yet, the cursots this transition & ccedil; & atilde; s & atilde, the high (both material resources as pol & iacute; ticos), something that requires a provi & ccedil; & atilde, the sustained.
When we analyze the debates on the reforms pol & iacute; Fret institutional, both the Cardoso government and the Lula government, we can see & eacute; to exist & ecirc; INSTANCE facing a worse & debate; preserves & ccedil; & atilde, the private interests within the state apparatus. In this sense, the discussion & HAND est á practically restricted & aggravate; supports & ccedil; & atilde; the State putting the quest & otilde; s long-term national goals and promo & ccedil; & atilde; the certain social structures in just ret & oacute plan; discursive practice.
The overcomes MAKE-HANDS, this IMPase are the & oacute; heat-hist & oacute; rich & depend abstract; the establishment of a new covenant & eacute; tico, in which all Brazilian social groups perceive that the identity m á Brazilian xima should, necessarily, overlap & agrave; s identities minor. Otherwise, Brazilian society be & aacute; assaulted by a fragmented sense of order to s & oacute; interests prevail specific & iacute; physical and immediate, without proper contextualizes & ccedil; & atilde, the.
A good eats & ccedil, the for this may be just the debate on the reform of Previd & ecirc; INSTANCE, more specifically with a change & ccedil; the by the magistrates, they should take a more consistent positioning profile, at risk of equaling couriers the big cities that rally together on viol & ecirc; INSTANCE without even having id & eacute; ia than it really is & aacute; going.
Moral of the hist & oacute; ria: No brazil, collective interest & eacute; sin & FLYING; nimo of corporate interest.
Daily: Brazilian judges, that seem to learn how to import & acirc; Corporatism INSTANCE still in banks universit á rivers, est & atilde, the aware of their special role in ensuring justice & ccedil; Brazil's formal, s & oacute; seem to forget that, as citizens & atilde; the, also & eacute; m s & HAND co-respons á LEVELS administered by MAKE-HANDS, the justice MAKE-social; and this involves putting the pa & iacute; s above their immediate sectoral interests.
Council Liter & aacute; rio:
& Quot; Democracy also & eacute; m takes a position & ccedil; & atilde; ambivalent front of specialized tests, as compared to all the fen & FLYING, less bureaucracy (…). special tests, in its turn, siginficam seem to mean a seal or & ccedil; & HAND of the qualifying, from all walks of life, the inv & eacute; s of a Government not á LEVELS. But, on the other hand, to democracy fears or M & eacute; rite and t RIVER privileged caste titles resulting numa. The & iacute;, her fight against the special examinations system"
Testing of Sociology / Bureaucracy – Max Weber
Testing of Sociology / Bureaucracy – Max Weber
Originally published in:
magazine Author (www.revistaautor.com.br)
Pol & iacute; tica
What III nº 26 – August 2003